AppraiseTrailRead-only sample
Fictional demonstration data · Sample case · Demo version 1 · Published June 2, 2026

Marisol Way hail and wind loss

Fictional completed Case

Two estimates. $57,448.00 apart. One traceable professional record.

See how two competing estimates became one traceable professional record.

Follow the disagreement through reconciliation, supporting evidence, final deliverables, and the portable Case File.

5-minute overview · deeper detail available

Step 1 of 5 · The disagreement

Two estimates rarely arrive in the same structure

The two positions are not directly comparable as totals.

Position A

Harborline Appraisal Group

$155,118.25

Position B

Sentinel Mutual Claims Services

$97,670.25

Stated difference

Between the two stated totals

$57,448.00

Why the totals aren't enough

“The two positions do not describe the same scope in the same way.”

The case

Property
4127 Marisol Way, Cedar Grove, TX 76043 (fictional address)
Loss
Hail and wind · March 14, 2026
Position A

Harborline Appraisal Group

Policyholder-appointed appraiser

Reviewed revision
Position A estimate · revision 1 · received April 18, 2026
Pricing basis
Regional unit-price database, March 2026 release, with O&P stated separately
Position B

Sentinel Mutual Claims Services

Carrier-appointed appraiser

Reviewed revision
Position B estimate · revision 1 · received April 22, 2026
Pricing basis
Carrier price list, February 2026 release, repair-first scope assumptions

AppraiseTrail keeps both source positions pinned to the exact revisions being reviewed, so later changes cannot silently rewrite the comparison.

You no longer have to remember which estimate version drove the analysis.

Step 2 of 5 · The reconciliation

The hard part is documenting why

Calculating the difference is easy. The difficult part is documenting why a scope or amount was supported in a way another reviewer can follow.

Supported position

$138,038.75

Scope with no material difference

$41,120.25

Scope groups reviewed

5

1 scope group referred to the umpire

Pinned source estimates

Both competing positions are published with this sample. Every page and line number cited below resolves to one of them.

Harborline Appraisal Group Estimate

Revision 1 · received April 18, 2026 · stated total $155,118.25

Sentinel Mutual Claims Services Estimate

Revision 1 · received April 22, 2026 · stated total $97,670.25

Fictional demonstration documents. Only these published sample sources can be opened.

Roof covering and underlayment

Same scope, different pricing basis

Partially supported
Position A stated
$71,200.00
Position B stated
$38,400.00
Supported
$64,850.00

Position A prices full slope replacement; Position B prices repair of two slopes with spot underlayment.

Gutters and downspouts

Scope stated on one position only

Position A supported
Position A stated
$11,278.00
Position B stated
Not present in this sourcePosition B revision 1 does not state gutter or downspout scope.
Supported
$11,278.00

The scope appears on Position A only. It is not priced at zero on Position B — it is simply not stated.

Interior water damage — upper floor

Overlapping scope

Partially supported
Position A stated
$22,100.00
Position B stated
$16,300.00
Supported
$18,940.50

Both positions price ceiling and drywall repair; they differ on painting extent and on whether insulation is replaced.

Detached garage

Same scope, different pricing basis

Referred to umpire
Position A stated
$9,420.00
Position B stated
$0.00 (stated)Position B states $0.00 with the note “no covered damage observed at detached structure”.
Supported
No supported amount recorded — referred to the umpire.

Position A prices roof and siding repair at the detached structure; Position B states zero for the same scope.

Temporary repairs and tarping

Same scope, different pricing basis

Position B supported
Position A stated
No price statedPosition A states the scope but records no price (“TBD pending vendor invoice”).
Position B stated
$1,850.00
Supported
$1,850.00

Both positions state the same scope. Only Position B states a price for it.

How this schedule evolved — Schedule v3 · Final
  1. v1 · April 28, 2026 Initial reconciliation draft.
  2. v2 · May 6, 2026 Updated after additional inspection evidence.
  3. v3 · Final · May 19, 2026 Final reconciliation; detached garage referred to umpire.

A reviewer can follow the decision back to the record without asking the original appraiser to reconstruct it.

Step 3 of 5 · Supporting evidence

The proof stays with the case

These are the records behind the Gutters and downspouts decision.

Property Inspection Recordv1 · April 2, 2026

Completed field inspection of the dwelling and detached structure

Documents the condition the appraisers actually observed, so the reconciliation rests on a recorded inspection rather than recollection.

Field observationCaptured during inspection · April 2, 2026

North elevation gutter separation and denting

The observation is the reason a scope stated on only one position was still supported.

Photo evidence12 photographs · April 2, 2026

Exterior elevation photo set

Lets a later reviewer see the documented condition instead of taking the narrative on trust.

Source estimate revisionsRevision 1 · Revision 1 · April 18 and April 22, 2026

Position A revision 1 and Position B revision 1

The comparison is pinned to these exact revisions, so a later estimate cannot silently rewrite the analysis.

Discrepancy resolution noteRecorded at reconciliation · May 12, 2026

Detached garage — no agreement reached

Records that the detached garage scope group was examined and referred to the umpire rather than quietly dropped.

Evidence stays connected to the case rather than becoming a separate file the next reviewer has to rediscover.

Step 4 of 5 · Professional deliverables

The final file is already assembled

The Report, Reconciliation Schedule, and Award are finalized from the same record the decisions were made in.

Case Report

v6 · Finalized May 19, 2026

Final

Concise professional summary of the completed appraisal record.

Give the reader the outcome without forcing them through the working file.

Estimate Comparison & Reconciliation Schedule

v3 · Finalized May 19, 2026

Final

Detailed comparison showing how material scope and pricing differences were reconciled and what supported each decision.

Let an auditor or umpire inspect the calculation and rationale without reconstructing the comparison.

Award

Recorded outcome · Finalized May 27, 2026

Final

Final professional outcome, preserved separately from the supported reconciliation position.

Preserve professional judgment separately from the supported analytical position.

Award and supported position are preserved separately

Supported position
$138,038.75
Award
$142,500.00
Difference
+$4,461.25

The detached garage scope group was referred to the umpire at reconciliation. The Award includes the umpire allowance, recorded separately from the supported analytical position. The Award does not overwrite the reconciliation: the analytical position and the professional outcome both remain readable.

Supporting records

  • Property Inspection Record v1
  • Position A estimate · revision 1 · received April 18, 2026
  • Position B estimate · revision 1 · received April 22, 2026
  • Exterior elevation photo set

What the client receives

Clients see the documents selected for them — not the firm's working file.

Final documents

  • Case Report v6
  • Estimate Comparison & Reconciliation Schedule v3
  • Award

Supporting records

  • Property Inspection Record v1
  • Exterior elevation photo set

Clients receive a deliberate professional package instead of a folder of loosely related files.

A clear package reduces ambiguity about what is final, what supports it, and which version the client received.

Step 5 of 5 · The portable record

The record still makes sense when the original appraiser is not in the room

The Case File preserves the issued documents, the sources they came from, and the lineage between them.

What the Case File contains

  • Case Report v6

    The exact finalized PDF, preserved as issued.

    Frozen copy
  • Reconciliation Schedule v3

    The exact finalized PDF, preserved as issued.

    Frozen copy
  • Award

    The recorded final outcome, preserved as issued.

    Frozen copy
  • Property Inspection Record v1

    A readable archive copy generated from the completed inspection record.

    Generated archive copy
  • Position A estimate · revision 1

    The source document as received, unaltered.

    Source document
  • Position B estimate · revision 1

    The source document as received, unaltered.

    Source document
  • Contents and lineage list

    Records what is in the file and where each item came from.

    Generated archive copy
Frozen copy:
Preserved exactly as it was finalized. It cannot change later.
Source document:
The document as it was received, kept unaltered.
Generated archive copy:
A readable copy produced from the case record for the archive.

How another reviewer follows the record

Sources
Exact estimate revisions and inspection evidence
Decisions
Reconciliation, rationale, and supported position
Issued record
Schedule, Report, Award, and portable Case File

The Case File preserves both the professional conclusions and enough source lineage for another reviewer to understand where they came from.

What changes for your firm

Less reconstruction

Estimates, evidence, decisions, and final documents stay connected, so the file does not have to be rebuilt later.

Easier professional review

A disputed amount leads back to its source revision, rationale, and supporting record without hunting across folders.

Clearer client delivery

The Report, Reconciliation Schedule, Award, and supporting records are issued as one deliberate package.

Ready to try it with a real case?

Try AppraiseTrail on one real case

We'll provision your workspace and help you through the first case.